Not one AI model. The right one, every time.
Betting on a single AI provider was always a fragile strategy. GearHead routes every task to the best-suited model from Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, DeepSeek, and Groq. When better models ship, your routing gets smarter automatically. You never have to migrate.
Six months ago, GPT-4 was the best general model. Then Claude pulled ahead on careful reasoning. Then Gemini won on long context. Then DeepSeek shifted the cost equation. The frontier moves every quarter, and any product locked to one provider is locked to that provider's curve.
GearHead's IntentRouterV4 analyzes every request and picks the best model for that specific task. Legal contract review goes to Claude. Long PDF analysis goes to Gemini. High-volume routine work goes to DeepSeek. Code generation gets routed by language and task type. Voice agent responses go to whichever model has the lowest latency at the moment.
On high-stakes outputs (document review, compliance checks, contract analysis), GearHead runs multi-model consensus: multiple models work on the same task in parallel, and only conclusions that multiple models agree on surface to you. Hallucinations have to survive three checks instead of one.
The routing model, explained
How the platform decides which AI handles what.
Intent classification first
Every request is classified by intent: legal research, code generation, customer email, long-doc analysis, brainstorming, factual lookup, image generation, voice response. Classification is fast and runs on a small dedicated model.
Model selected by fit
Each model has a profile: strengths, latency, context window, cost per token, current health. The router picks the best match for the intent. Claude for nuance and careful reasoning. GPT for general work. Gemini for long context. DeepSeek for cost-efficiency. Groq for low-latency voice.
Multi-model consensus on high stakes
Document Review, compliance checks, contract drafting, and other high-stakes outputs run through multiple models in parallel. Conclusions only surface when multiple models agree. Disagreements are flagged for human review instead of confidently presented.
Automatic upgrades
When providers release new models, the platform evaluates them against the existing fleet and adopts the better ones automatically. You got Claude 4.6 when it shipped. You got GPT-5 when it shipped. You will get whatever comes next, without changing anything.
Override controls
You can pin specific models for specific task types. Pin Claude for all legal work. Pin Gemini for long-doc analysis. Set quality-vs-cost preferences at the account level. The default routing is good. The overrides are for the cases where you have a strong opinion.
Transparency on routing
Every response shows which model handled it, with one click for cost, latency, and routing rationale. No black box. You can see why a particular model was chosen and override the decision for next time.
Model fleet
The current generation of models GearHead routes across. This list updates as providers ship new models.
See the product feature: Model Agnostic
The product feature page covers the user-facing controls: how to see which model handled what, how to pin models per task, and how the Premium Models add-on works.
Open the feature page →See the routing in action.
Book a walkthrough. We will demo a real task running through the router, including consensus on a high-stakes contract review.